This blog aims to dispel some common misunderstandings about the interplay between obtaining a divorce and finalising your property settlement formally. After a marriage breakdown, some people choose only to get a divorce or only finalise property settlement. However, suppose you only get a divorce and do not finalise property settlement (in a binding manner). In that case, you may not be protecting your financial interests, both now or in the future.
A property settlement can be finalised by Consent Orders, a Binding Financial Agreement, or by Final Orders from the Family or Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
All too many times, we hear the following questions or statements from parties that have separated:
"We have got a divorce, so we don't need anything else, right?"
"We decided to save the legal fees and amicably divide the assets ourselves. we will get divorced later to finalise it."
"We are going to get the divorce first and then sort out the property stuff later."
"Can you help me with the divorce? We don't need anything else, just the divorce".
Once a Divorce Order comes into effect, it terminates your marriage. This allows you to re-marry in the future.
You can learn more about the process of divorce in our blog "Getting a divorce in Australia".
There is a common misconception that a divorce finalises all aspects of your relationship. Importantly, however, a divorce does not legally determine who gets what assets and liabilities in the marriage.
Consent Orders (along with options like a Binding Financial Agreement) serve to sever your financial relationship with your former partner on a final and binding basis.
This means that going forward, neither party can make a claim on each other's assets. Further, the parties must indemnify the other in relation to any liabilities incurred in their sole name.
Unfortunately, we have had clients who have agreed with their partners to divide all assets and liabilities in an informal, non-binding manner. This has resulted in disputes about that arrangement at a later date.
Similarly, imagine separating from your de-facto partner:
But if you haven't severed your financial relationship by Consent Orders or other means and the time limitation period hasn't expired (two years from the date of separation for de facto couples), then your ex-partner is entitled to make a claim on some of those lotto winnings.
If you and your partner are both on title as joint tenants or tenants in common and one party will be retaining the former matrimonial home, then you should enter into Consent Orders to affect the transfer of this property from one party to another.
The benefits of doing so are to ensure:
Our advice is if you want to engage a lawyer to help with only one aspect (either the divorce or the property settlement), make it your property settlement!
From a legal perspective, severing your financial relationship on a final basis is far more important and more complex than terminating the marriage.
The family law team at E&A Lawyers will be able to guide you through your property settlement needs. We look at your specific and unique circumstances to ensure we protect your financial future.
For more information to arrange a consultation with a lawyer, you can call or email us.
Phone: 02 9997 2111
This article is of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact E&A Lawyers.
When you meet with our expert lawyers they'll be ready to provide advice.
Our online system allows you to get started anywhere, any time - and provides information that is instant, personalised, and helpful. We can also assemble your complete relationship history online, which will help us reduce costs you book in for an appointment.